For each disclosure or report it receives, the Québec Ombudsman determines whether or not it can investigate. At the end of an investigation, if we see that wrongdoing has occurred, we make recommendations. We make them to the responsible authorities so that the situation is corrected or the problem is denounced. Here are investigation conclusions that show how our interventions are carried out.
Le Protecteur du citoyen a reçu une divulgation visant un haut-gestionnaire d’un organisme public. Celui-ci se serait placé en situation de conflit d’intérêts dans le cadre d’un projet où l’utilisation d’animaux était nécessaire.
The Protecteur du citoyen received a disclosure about a senior manager of an institution of higher learning. He allegedly was in conflict of interest when he favoured the hiring of someone he knew well.
The Protecteur du citoyen received a report about an intermediate resource that takes in adults with severe disabilities. It decided to intervene.
The Protecteur du citoyen received a report about a hospital in Trois-Rivières. It decided to intervene.
The Protecteur du citoyen decided to intervene further to reports about the Birth Pavilion at Hôpital Anna-Laberge. According to the events reported, the staff’s lack of training allegedly compromised the quality of services.
The Protecteur du citoyen was informed about worrisome problems with the care delivered at Montreal Children’s Hospital. It decided to intervene with McGill University Health Centre, which is responsible for the care and services provided at the hospital.
According to several reports, the safety and well-being of CIUSSS de l’Estrie – CHUS CHSLDs residents were allegedly compromised. The Protecteur du citoyen decided to intervene.
The Protecteur du citoyen received a report about the emergency room at Hôpital Santa Cabrini Ospedale, in Montréal. Every month, hundreds of people remain longer than the 24-hour limit set by the Department. The Protecteur du citoyen decided to intervene.
The Protecteur du citoyen received a report about the care offered to the residents of Pavillon Philippe-Lapointe, a residential and long-term care centre (CHSLD) located in the Laurentians. The Protecteur du citoyen decided to intervene.
A person witnessed acts by a university professor that they believed were wrong. The witness spoke out to the Protecteur du citoyen about conflicts of interest and unauthorized use of a public body’s property.
